The tracker · United States

Dodd-Frank Act, Section 1502 (Conflict Minerals)

In force United States Entry updated January 2026

The original supply chain disclosure statute, requiring conflict minerals reporting from SEC filers since 2014.

StatusIn force
EnactedJuly 2010
First compliance deadlineMay 2014 filings
Companies in scopeSEC-reporting companies using tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold necessary to their products
Maximum penaltySecurities law penalties for false or misleading filings
Civil liabilityThrough securities litigation
Enforcement bodyUS Securities and Exchange Commission

Latest movement

Filing regime stable; SEC enforcement posture unchanged for over a decade.

In plain language

What this law does

Section 1502 requires SEC-reporting companies to determine whether their products contain tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold originating in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries, and to file conflict minerals reports describing their due diligence. The regime built the smelter-level audit infrastructure that later laws now rely upon.

Its lessons are studied as much as its text: a decade of filings shows both the possibilities of supply chain transparency and the limits of disclosure without consequences, a debate that continues to shape newer due diligence laws.

Obligations

What it asks of companies

  1. Reasonable country of origin inquiry

    Filers must conduct a good faith inquiry into whether covered minerals originated in the covered countries.

  2. Due diligence and Form SD filing

    Where origin is covered or unknown, OECD-aligned due diligence and an annual Form SD filing are required.

Timeline

How it got here

July 2010

Dodd-Frank Act signed into law.

August 2012

SEC adopted the implementing rule.

May 2014

First conflict minerals reports filed.

Changelog

Entry history

January 2026

Annual review completed; no material regime changes.

Sources

Primary documents

Same jurisdiction

Related regimes